Revised geometric estimates of the North Galactic Pole and the Sun's height above the Galactic mid-plane

Abstract

Astronomers are entering an era of ${\mu}$as-level astrometry utilizing the 5-decade-old IAU Galactic coordinate system which was only originally defined to ~ $0^{\circ}.1$ accuracy, and where the dynamical centre of the Galaxy (Sgr A$*$) is located ~$0^{\circ}.07$ from the origin. We calculate new independent estimates of the North Galactic Pole (NGP) using recent catalogues of Galactic disc tracer objects such as embedded and open clusters, infrared bubbles, dark clouds and young massive stars. Using these catalogues, we provide two new estimates of the NGP. Solution 1 is an ‘unconstrained’ NGP determined by the Galactic tracer sources, which does not take into account the location of Sgr A$*$, and which lies $90^{\circ}.120 \pm 0^{\circ}.029$ from Sgr A$*$, and Solution 2 is a ‘constrained’ NGP which lies exactly $90^{\circ}$ from Sgr A$*$. The ‘unconstrained’ NGP has International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) position: $\alpha_{NGP} = 192^{\circ}.729 \pm 0^{\circ}.035$, $ \delta_{NGP} = 27^{\circ}.084 \pm 0.023$ and $\theta = 122^{\circ}.928 \pm 0^{\circ}.016$.The ‘constrained’ NGP which lies exactly $90^{\circ}$ away from Sgr A$*$ has ICRS position: $\alpha_{NGP} = 192^{\circ}.728 \pm 0^{\circ}.010$, $\delta_{NGP} = 26^{\circ}.863 \pm 0^{\circ}.019$ and $\theta = 122^{\circ}.928 \pm 0^{\circ}.016$. The difference between the solutions is likely due to the Sun lying above the Galactic mid-plane. Considering the angular separation between Sgr A$*$ and our unconstrained NGP, and if one adopts the recent estimate of the Galactocentric distance for the Sun of $R_{0} = 8.2 \pm 0.1$ kpc , then we estimate that the Sun lies $z_{\odot} \simeq 17 \pm 5$ pc above the Galactic mid-plane. Our value of $z_{\odot}$ is consistent with the true median of 55 previous estimates published over the past century of the Sun’s height above the Galactic mid-plane ($z_{\odot} \simeq 17 \pm 2$ pc).

Publication
In Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 465, Issue 1, p.472-481.
Date